Consequences
When the Average Joe thinks about what's gone wrong with the war in Iraq, he thinks mainly about two things: the number of troops killed, and the cost (though of course the latter is nebulous to most). But it's important to understand that this war affects every American in a variety of indirect ways. Here's a window on that from USA Today:
But there's a problem with that, as Contrary Investor notes:
It's all about consequences, and the desire of the Fed and White House to avoid them. Remember, desperate statists do desperate things. Keeping in mind that geopolitical tension over Iran's nuclear program gives the Fed and White House much-needed cover for the way our fiscal and monetary policies are driving the price of oil higher---and Iran's oil represents our ability to print our way through painful consequences---what do you think happens next?
For 45 years, Robert and Lorraine Brown have lived in their ranch-style home in Florissant, Mo. One of their four children was even born there. But for the past eight months, the couple have been locked in a sleep-wrecking race to keep up with their rising mortgage bills. They've switched to cheaper phone service, cut back on groceries and sometimes put off ordering medicine.I've written in the past that I believe the Federal Reserve cannot stop raising rates as long as oil is over $60 and gold is staring at $600; if the Fed made it clear tomorrow that the "8th inning crowd" was finally about to be right after a year of being wrong, oil would shoot for $80 and higher and gold would rocket as well. Instead, the Fed will continue to understate inflation, continue to raise rates at a snail's pace to mollify foreign central banks, and---most importantly---continue to flood the financial system with liquidity to support the stock market.
When they refinanced their home two years ago to pay off some bills, Robert, now 78, was working as a deliveryman. But his employer went out of business last April. Now he and Lorraine, 72, a retired nurse, are both seeking work. The rate on their mortgage has jumped from 7% to 10.5%.
"We were having a hard time meeting bills at the time we refinanced. It seems once you get behind, you do desperate things to catch up, and you never do," says Lorraine, trying to hold back tears. "At the time of the loan, they tell you, 'Well, it may go up, but it's probably going to go down.' You want it to be so, so you believe it."
They feel alone, but they're not. America's five-year real estate boom was fueled partly by a tempting array of cut-rate mortgages that helped millions of Americans qualify for home or refinance loans. To afford soaring home prices, many turned to adjustable-rate and other, riskier loans with low initial payments. The homeownership rate hit a record 70%.
Now, the real estate market is cooling, interest rates are rising and tens of thousands more Americans are starting to have trouble paying their mortgages. Nearly 25% of mortgages -- 10 million -- carry adjustable interest rates. And most of them went to people with subpar credit ratings who accepted higher interest rates, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
Last week, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates for the 15th time since June 2004 and signaled that at least one more increase is likely. That trend is ominous for borrowers who were seduced by adjustable-rate loans that offered interest-only payment options or teaser rates below 2% or that let the borrower pay less than the interest owed. They will face bigger payment shock once their loans reset to higher rates.
But there's a problem with that, as Contrary Investor notes:
In our minds, if the Fed simply stops raising rates somewhere over the next three to four months, yet continues the excess liquidity pump, we believe very little to nothing is gained in terms of trying to stall accelerating energy and commodity prices ahead. And IF indeed this acceleration is not halted to some extent and these forces do show up in headline and core CPI as part of natural economic follow through in the quarters ahead, the Fed is going to have one big problem on its hands. They just might have to restart the rate increase cycle later in the year (assuming they pause in the interim) if CPI rates move north at the exact time that the markets have been acting to discount the demise of the rate increase cycle. If you ask us, we believe the Fed faces some very tough choices over the near term.This is part of the "event horizon" I've posted about before. Due in large measure to the costs of Iraq, the Federal Reserve must continue to raise rates to keep foreigners---increasingly unwilling to underwrite our deficit spending and preemptive wars---from jumping ship. But as rates go higher, the crucial real estate market will continue to weaken and millions of voters like the elderly couple above will feel the pinch. That's not a good thing in a midterm election year when control of Congress is at stake and words like impeachment are getting thrown around. To ameliorate the pain of higher rates, the Fed continues to support the stock market with liquidity. But that same liquidity, of course, is why oil continues its inexorable march higher, gold sits at fresh quarter-century highs, and things we all need like food and clothing keep getting more expensive.
It's all about consequences, and the desire of the Fed and White House to avoid them. Remember, desperate statists do desperate things. Keeping in mind that geopolitical tension over Iran's nuclear program gives the Fed and White House much-needed cover for the way our fiscal and monetary policies are driving the price of oil higher---and Iran's oil represents our ability to print our way through painful consequences---what do you think happens next?
15 Comments:
Which is why my long-term investments are still in natural resources, and my guess is thats where it will likely stay until 2008.
At least we won't have M3 to kick around anymore; it only served to keep inflationary expectations alive, and really, who would want that?
Indeed, prices are rising.
Stories like this one as well as all the signs at gas stations tend to form consumers' opinion about the economy far more than what the treasury secratary is saying. Or what a new one might say because people get their gas/electric bill each month and they see what's really going on.
Instead of showing concern, policy makers seem to grow more determined to keep pushing and I don't think they see the approaching cliff.
Wait, wait. You mean the same team that handled Katrina so well is now going to screw up the economy?
I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
Good information. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Charlie Cowan
charlie cowan real estate
http://www.etowahrealty.com
Whats new Today
I love audio books and am glad to be on your site. If you want to find out more about......audio books then go visit http://homec4u.com......You wont be disapointed..
Hey just to let you know that yes I am promoting this but if you dont want to save at the pump then dont go to the site but I believe no matter who you are gas is just to expensive.
The goverment is using it and many other huge company's. This is not just some fly by night company or product. This is the real deal.
That's a great story. Waiting for more. » »
This comment has been removed by the author.
How to start a debt settlement program?
You can do it yourself by contacting your creditors directly. If you are not comfortable in dealing with them, contact Xyourdebt.com to represent you against your creditors. The settlement company will create a trust account for you. Every month you will save a certain amount of money in that trust account. The maximum amount that you can deposit in your trust account depends on your disposable income (monthly income and monthly expenditure = disposable income).
The settlement company then negotiates with your creditors for a reduced and affordable amount. An efficient settlement company can reduce the payable amount to 40% - 60% of your original amount.
It is true that creditors and collection agencies often deny negotiating with consumers. They prefer to create pressure on the consumer to collect more money. If they deny coming to any agreement, contact a reputed settlement company to make it happen. There are a couple of debt settlement firms in USA that can make you debt free by working on your behalf. The settlement companies or firms have the experience and know very well how to deal with creditors and collection agencies.
http://www.Xyourdebt.com
asbestosis​attorneys.​com
The death of English textile worker Nellie Kershaw in 1924 from pulmonary asbestosis was the first case to be described in medical literature, and the first published account of disease attributed to occupational asbestos exposure. However, her former employers (Turner Brothers Asbestos) denied that asbestosis even existed because the medical condition was not officially recognised at the time. As a result, they accepted no liability for her injuries and paid no compensation, either to Kershaw during her final illness or to her bereaved family after she had died. Even so, the findings of the inquest into her death were highly influential insofar as they led to a parliamentary enquiry by the British Government. The enquiry formally acknowledged the existence of asbestosis, recognised that it was hazardous to health and concluded that it was irrefutably linked to the prolonged inhalation of asbestos dust. Having established the existence of asbestosis on a medical and judicial basis, the report resulted in the first Asbestos Industry Regulations being published in 1931, which came into effect on 1 March 1932.
The first lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers occurred in 1929. Since then, many lawsuits have been filed against asbestos manufacturers and employers, for neglecting to implement safety measures after the link between asbestos, asbestosis and mesothelioma became known (some reports seem to place this as early as 1898 in modern times). The liability resulting from the sheer number of lawsuits and people affected has reached billions of dollars. The amounts and method of allocating compensation have been the source of many court cases, and government attempts at resolution of existing and future cases.
Police misconduct refers to inappropriate actions taken by police officers in connection with their official duties. Police misconduct can lead to a miscarriage of justice and sometimes involves discrimination. In an effort to control police misconduct, there is an accelerating trend for civilian agencies to go beyond review to engage directly in investigations and to have much greater input into disciplinary decisions. With the proliferation of mobile devices capable of recording alleged misconduct, existing eavesdropping laws in some jurisdictions are being leveraged to prosecute civilians, while in other circumstances police will illegally seize or delete evidence
Intellectual property (IP) is a term referring to a number of distinct types of creations of the mind for which a set of exclusive rights are recognized under the corresponding fields of law. Under intellectual property law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights to a variety of intangible assets, such as musical, literary, and artistic works; discoveries and inventions; and words, phrases, symbols, and designs. Common types of intellectual property rights include copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights and trade secrets in some jurisdictions.
Although many of the legal principles governing intellectual property have evolved over centuries, it was not until the 19th century that the term intellectual property began to be used, and not until the late 20th century that it became commonplace in the majority of the world. The British Statute of Anne 1710 and the Statute of Monopolies 1623 are now seen as the origins of copyright and patent law respectively
optimallyorganics.com
Post a Comment
<< Home