Sunday, August 27, 2006


Writing about the release of the Fox News employees, Cliff May stumbles onto a good point:
And that’s great news. But the Reuters story up on Drudge right now (it may not be up for long) says that Steve Centanni and Olaf Wiig "appeared on a new videotape" and said "they had converted to Islam."

"They were shown separately sitting cross-legged, reading a statement which Fox said was an announcement that they had converted to Islam. At times in the video they were wearing long Muslim robes. Wiig called on leaders of the West to stop 'hiding behind the 'I don't negotiate with terrorists' myth'. He then read some words in Arabic."

I just watched the reporters give a news conferences in which I didn’t hear them discuss this (maybe I missed that part or perhaps they did talk about it but it wasn’t included on-air). Instead, they emphasized how important it is that journalists not be discouraged from covering Gaza from “telling the story of the Palestinian people.” Is the mission of Fox’s London bureau to tell the story of the British people?” Do reporters cover the White House in order to tell President Bush’s story?

I’m glad these guys are safe and free. I wish them well. But I hope there will be some attention paid by Fox and other media to the way in which kidnappings and similar threats coerce and intimidate journalists, and may influence their coverage.
There's a good point here, but May makes it by accident. While focusing on what is at best a minor issue---these mass conversions to Islam that journalists are undergoing at gunpoint distort the news we get!---he gives a disingenuous nod to the time when journalism-as-advocacy was the exception and not the rule. Is May just now learning that Fox News crossed that line long ago?


Anonymous semper fubar said...

No, I doubt if Cliff May is "learning" anything. This would require some critical thinking on his part and an ability to discern analogies, capabilities he's shown precious little of. The obvious has escaped the republicans so many times, it's sort of pointless to ask at each potential teaching moment "Is our conservatives learning?"

8/27/2006 2:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The missile struck the vehicle after dark."

A more plausible explanation is that in the confusion of a nighttime operation Israeli soldiers mistook the car for an enemy.

And the Israelis deliberately attacked the USS Liberty? *Skoff* Bamford's claim that the Liberty was attacked to conceal a huge massacre has a major flaw: no huge massacre occurred. "Cunning Realist", indeed.

8/28/2006 9:08 PM  
Anonymous Mr. Hedley Bowes said...

[waves to the progandists from Faux News]

8/29/2006 12:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

think bush/bolty should check carefully that its not anything like the bulava/ss27 topol before doing iran too quick...,,1859615,00.html

8/29/2006 5:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

AMAZING...!!! Dear friends, Now you can Fulfill your destiny! LordoftheHits is the lord of all exchanges. One exchange to rule them all!!! Hook up NOW with this exiting program. Click here: FREE INFORMATION

10/24/2006 9:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home