Saturday, September 16, 2006

Faith-Based Reconstruction

From a longer WaPo piece:
After the fall of Saddam Hussein's government in April 2003, the opportunity to participate in the U.S.-led effort to reconstruct Iraq attracted all manner of Americans -- restless professionals, Arabic-speaking academics, development specialists and war-zone adventurers. But before they could go to Baghdad, they had to get past Jim O'Beirne's office in the Pentagon.

To pass muster with O'Beirne, a political appointee who screens prospective political appointees for Defense Department posts, applicants didn't need to be experts in the Middle East or in post-conflict reconstruction. What seemed most important was loyalty to the Bush administration.

O'Beirne's staff posed blunt questions to some candidates about domestic politics: Did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000? Do you support the way the president is fighting the war on terror? Two people who sought jobs with the U.S. occupation authority said they were even asked their views on Roe v. Wade.

One former CPA employee who had an office near O'Beirne's wrote an e-mail to a friend describing the recruitment process: "I watched résumés of immensely talented individuals who had sought out CPA to help the country thrown in the trash because their adherence to 'the President's vision for Iraq' (a frequently heard phrase at CPA) was 'uncertain.' I saw senior civil servants from agencies like Treasury, Energy . . . and Commerce denied advisory positions in Baghdad that were instead handed to prominent RNC [Republican National Committee] contributors."

As more and more of O'Beirne's hires arrived in the Green Zone, the CPA's headquarters in Saddam Hussein's marble-walled former Republican Palace felt like a campaign war room. Bumper stickers and mouse pads praising President Bush were standard desk decorations. Other than military uniforms and "Operation Iraqi Freedom" garb, "Bush-Cheney 2004" T-shirts were among the most common pieces of clothing.

"I'm not here for the Iraqis," one worker noted to a reporter over lunch. "I'm here for George Bush."
Read the rest here. I suspect that when real investigative and subpoena power returns to Washington, we'll get a better look behind the curtain. Of course, literally anything will be said or done to prevent that power from changing hands in November. Vigilance....

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

When is the cognitive dissonance going to reach critical mass?

9/16/2006 6:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for posting the article - KS.

9/16/2006 8:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Heckuva job Beirney"

9/16/2006 10:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this Kate O'Beirne's husband by any chance?

And Ned, the GOP may expunge Bush and his cabinet to their electoral advantage in '08, but in my view the only way the U.S. wil recover international credibility is through impeachment and prompt extradition to The Hague.

9/16/2006 10:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

there is no way they will lose november...the only is thing is how to make the win appear believable...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZws98jw67g

no burning required here...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060913/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/mexico_ballots

9/16/2006 10:52 PM  
Blogger Reality-Based Educator said...

C.R., that's IF real investigative and subpoena power returns to Washington. After the $60 million dollar negative ad dump, the "vaunted" GOTV effort, and the usual Diebold shenanagins, we could be looking at another two years of Republican power and no return to oversight and accountability.

9/16/2006 10:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What then? Rehab?

9/17/2006 3:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

bet bush does not step down before he spills blood on home soil...that would make his legacy complete...

'the revolution was effected before the war. the revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people...the radical change in principles, opinions, sentiment and affections of the people was the real american revolution.'[John Adams]

9/17/2006 10:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From an earlier WaPo article at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48543-2004May22.html

"Ledeen's journey to Baghdad began two weeks earlier when she received an e-mail out of the blue from the Pentagon's White House liaison office. The Sept. 16 message informed her that the occupation government in Iraq needed employees to prepare for an international conference.... For months they [Ledeen and others who received the same e-mail] wondered what they had in common, how their names had come to the attention of the Pentagon, until one day they figured it out: They had all posted their resumes at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative-leaning think tank."

Friggin' loonies. The people who organized the CPA shouldn't have been allowed to establish a lemonade stand, let alone an occupation government.

9/17/2006 5:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There were also stories about Douglas Feith and his band of jokers being in on who got chosen at the CPA. Suppossedly anyone who spoke Arabic got turned down.

The two biggest problems we had in Iraq were lack of troops and too few translators.

This is nothing short of criminal and deserves to be a national scandal.

9/17/2006 7:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

if you're really naughty, you get sent to run the world bank and un...

9/19/2006 10:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=RAI20060921&articleId=3291

9/21/2006 12:36 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home